Peter Singer is an Australian philosopher who created a thought experiment called The Drowning Child, in 2009.

In this thought experiment, we imagine ourselves walking down the street. Suddenly, we notice a girl drowning in a lake. We have the ability to swim, and we are also close enough to save her life if we take action immediately. However, doing so will ruin our expensive shoes. Do we still have an obligation to save her?

Peter’s answer to this question is yes. We do have a responsibility to save the life of a drowning child and price is no object. If we agree with him on this statement, it leads us to a salient thought-provoking question: If we are obligated to save the life of a child in need, is there a fundamental difference between saving one who is right in front of us and one on the other side of the world?

In his book, The Life You Can Save, Peter argues that there is no moral difference between a child drowning in front of you and one starving in some far off land. The cost of the ruined shoes in saving a drowning child is analogous to the cost of a donation in saving a starving child. And if the value of our shoes is irrelevant to us, the price of the charity should be irrelevant too. If we save the nearby child, we have to save the distant one too. He, in fact, even put his money where his mouth is, and started a program to make people donate to charities across the world.

There are definitely some arguments against this thought experiment. Most of them rely on the idea that a drowning child is in a different type of situation than a child who is starving in another part of the world, and that they require different solutions which impose different obligations.

Most of us would innately rescue a child drowning in front of us – it would be rather monstrous to compare a child’s life to a pair of shoes! But how many of us really pay attention to charities? How many of us actually donate to charities? How many of us take a second to sympathise a child who is starving in a city overwhelmed with poverty? What is the difference?

⁃ SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️

263 responses to “The Drowning Child”

  1. Paul Avatar
    Paul

    Fundamentally the two cases are the same, the only difference being that the drowning child is right in front of you and, therefore, has your immediate attention. It is far too easy to ignore the distant child and then justify your lack of attention afterwards.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. ERICOTRIPS GOT THE IDEAL INSPIRATION BLOGGER AWARD! – ericotrips Avatar
    ERICOTRIPS GOT THE IDEAL INSPIRATION BLOGGER AWARD! – ericotrips

    […] Saania Sparkle […]

    Like

  3. barkinginthedark Avatar
    barkinginthedark

    First off, thank you for the nice word about my stuff. Secondly, and more important, i would like to think i asked the same questions as you when i was your tender age. However, i didn’t. Well done girrrl. continue…

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Vashti Q Avatar
    Vashti Q

    You have a lovely blog, Saania! 😀 You’re right, if the drowning child is right in front of us most of us would do something to save her. Unfortunately, many people have become cynical about charities, because many of them had been dishonest and had misappropriated funds. :/

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Shauna Avatar
      Shauna

      I was thinking that too 😦
      Also, that there are so many worthy causes and you cannot support everything. 😥

      Like

  5. revjerry Avatar
    revjerry

    If you can away from the child drowning in front of you, how much easier to turn away from the starving child on the other side of the earth! For me, the simple thing to do is try and save the one I can, no matter where they are. I may not be able to save them all, but I can save those I can.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. carhicks Avatar
    carhicks

    This is a very interesting way of looking at childhood poverty and how we can help others. I have not heard of this Thought Experiment before but I really like it. There are so many people at home and around the world that are suffering and dying in silence that we can help. I am going to do some research on Peter Singer so I can put something in my church newsletter about this.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. bhattraps,beauty of fusions Avatar
    bhattraps,beauty of fusions

    I have sent you a friend request to accept invitation for my blogs to follow,plse accept the request it will be privilageand good honour to work with you and aswell got your valuable feedbacks on my blogs.Looking forward to it.Have a plesant day..

    Like

  8. Singh Lovely Avatar
    Singh Lovely

    Very interested post🙂😊😊

    Like

  9. Shelly DS Avatar
    Shelly DS

    I’ve just fallen in love with your blog!!! You touch on some very interesting points which make me think long and hard about life. I would dive in and save the child in a heart beat, but my selfish side says why not take the shoes off first? Basically it’s a dilemma between self preservation and acts of kindness because I know that it is ultimately my own responsibility to look after myself since no one else will do it for me. Not sure if it is possible to have it both ways though.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Raj Avatar
    Raj

    Very nice blog.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️ Avatar
      SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️

      Thank you so much!

      Like

  11. MissBluw Avatar
    MissBluw

    Beautiful. Very thought provoking

    Like

  12. Nawfal Avatar
    Nawfal

    You can do both, if you can swim, and if you have the means to help monetarily. It’s funny you mentioned shoes. During the Serb/Bosnian/Croat War, when I was communicating with friends in Bosnia, who were suffering badly, I asked them, “What do you need?” They replied, “Shoes—the children need shoes.” (It was wintertime, and it was cold). I shipped about two dozen pairs of shoes, of varying sizes for children. I have no idea if the shoes ever made it to the intended people (I mailed them to an aid organization), or if they were pilfered by post office thieves, which happens a lot, in every country. I just hope some children, any children over there, benefited from the shoes I sent. This is a very good post, thanks for spending the time on it. : ^)

    Liked by 1 person

  13. romanticindeed Avatar
    romanticindeed

    If this child was my child, I’d feel the utmost responsibility to rescue them from drowning. If I knew of another child who belonged to another pair of parents, and that child was drowning, I’d ask, “Where are that child’s parents to rescue him/her?”

    As in, I shouldn’t be the one to do the job that someone else should be doing.

    Like

  14. Aswathy Gopalakrishnan Avatar
    Aswathy Gopalakrishnan

    When something happens right infront of your eyes, it’s more believable. In the current world where a lot of scams are there taking advantage of the good, I personally am a little skeptical about being generous unless I can see it directly or find its from a trustworthy source.

    Like

  15. Megha Avatar
    Megha

    Interesting post. We care for what we see. Rest doesn’t stay in our memory, unfortunately.

    Like

  16. Deepak Maindola Avatar
    Deepak Maindola

    Nice one Saania, you are a inspiring person. Keep it up and stay in touch.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. mariner2mother Avatar
    mariner2mother

    If everyone helps the people nearest them, no one would go without help. And before jumping into water to rescue a drowning child, make sure you know what you’re doing (because if you don’t, you could both drown), and kick your shoes off, no matter if they’re expensive or not.

    Like

  18. Earthpages.org Avatar
    Earthpages.org

    One argument for not giving to global charities is that you never really know how much if any of your money actually goes to the purported remedy. Too often hypocritical organizers take the lion’s share of funds to maintain a ‘do-goody’ persona pasted on top of upper-middle-class, jet-set lifestyles. Even worse, in some countries, local crimelords misappropriate donation dollars, foodstuffs, and medical supplies for their own twisted purposes.

    You are a young person and probably still a bit starry-eyed due to your youthfulness. That is wonderful and we need optimists. But true philosophers see as many sides as possible… 🙂

    Like

  19. Dulcy Singh Avatar
    Dulcy Singh

    Excellent post 👍

    Like

  20. Shivam Choudhary Avatar
    Shivam Choudhary
  21. Aushana Avatar
    Aushana

    So, tell me, Saania. What drew you to thought experiments? What excites you about them?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️ Avatar
      SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️

      It helps me to stretch my mind by confronting difficult questions, they are like tools to become great thinkers!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Aushana Avatar
        Aushana

        It’s exciting to read your thoughts on various subjects.

        Like

      2. Aushana Avatar
        Aushana

        Hey, I found this site iambobbyy.com and it deals with philosophy. I think you may like it.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️ Avatar
        SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️

        Thank-you so much for letting me know, I’ll have a look for sure!

        Like

  22. Sobia Avatar
    Sobia

    Interesting.. enjoyed reading this. 💕👍🏻👍🏻

    Liked by 1 person

    1. SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️ Avatar
      SaaniaSparkle 🧚🏻‍♀️

      Thank you so so much 💕

      Like

  23. theresaly520 Avatar
    theresaly520

    Something to make me ponder! This experiment makes me think of a conversation I had with mom last night. I wrote a long blog post about it this morning, but wondering if it’s too long. Have a wonderful day, Saania!

    Like

  24. Part 1: Reflections on “The Drowning Child” – Culture Shocks Avatar
    Part 1: Reflections on “The Drowning Child” – Culture Shocks

    […] morning I was intrigued by a blogger’s article called “The Drowning Child“. At 15 years old, Saania is wise beyond her years and constantly looking for ways to expand […]

    Like

  25. Kelsie Lou Avatar
    Kelsie Lou

    Saving the drowning child in front of you gives an immediate solution we can see. Sending money to an overseas charity comes with the risk of not knowing if the money/food is going directly into that child’s mouth or to fund some “executive committee.”

    Like

  26. RyanREhinger Avatar
    RyanREhinger

    I visited various internet sites however the audio quality for audio songs current around this site
    is in reality superb.

    Feel free to visit my blog: RyanREhinger

    Like

  27. gerlintpetrazamonesh Avatar
    gerlintpetrazamonesh

    Explosive Shoes aren’t nice. But I’m always saying, teaching first help: You have to be save. First look, then call help (everyone has a phone) – then decide. Especially a drowning one, a child too, ist dangerous, is taking you down with him, her, it. Do it only, if you are a very trained swimmer – otherwise (I would! I’m not a very good swimmer) wait a little while. He, she, it will be slow and silent. Then go, then swim! That’s rescue.
    For danger you don’t need explosive shoes.
    Yes, I remember sometime I was in the situation. Swimming with my own child threw the danube. I know, what I’m saying. And yes, I wasn’t waiting. My child, you know. If I think back, breathing fails.

    Like

  28. LyleEHopwood Avatar
    LyleEHopwood

    Great article.

    Also visit my blog post … LyleEHopwood

    Like

  29. DongIDemmert Avatar
    DongIDemmert

    These are truly fantastic ideas in regarding blogging.
    You may have touched some nice things here. In whatever way continue wrinting.

    Visit my blog post … DongIDemmert

    Like

  30. Wyrd Smythe Avatar
    Wyrd Smythe

    I think it’s an issue of scale. I can save a drowning child; I can’t save the world.

    There’s a scene in the old TV show M*A*S*H where the main character, Hawkeye, talks about how hard the world’s problems seem, but if we all focus on making the patch of life around us better, then the world does get better.

    As always, the trick is getting everyone to buy in. 😮

    Like

  31. spiritualfantasia Avatar
    spiritualfantasia

    hmmm… very interesting moral dilemma! it does seem like there is not one that is more morally right to save, they are both kids that he has the ability to help. however, there is the possibility that the guy saving the drowning girl was the only guy around who knew how to swim and help her, whereas a lot of people have the ability to donate to charity. thus, he has a greater moral obligation to save the drowning child as he is the only one with the ability to do so!

    Like

  32. navigate to this web-site electrician near me free estimate Avatar
    navigate to this web-site electrician near me free estimate

    great post, very informative. I wonder why the other experts of this sector do not notice this. You must continue your writing. I am sure, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!

    Like

  33. The Visual Ecstacy Avatar
    The Visual Ecstacy

    Nicely written Saania👌

    Like

  34. nedhamson Avatar
    nedhamson
  35. shiny787 Avatar
    shiny787

    Awesome! I craft and sell my items for charity, but never thought about it that way… Definitely will be reblogged!

    Like

Leave a comment

Latest Articles